Taking a Break at Lunch at the Office?

However, the current knowledge on micro-breaks relies considerably on experimental data testing their effects, such as improved self-control capacity, mood, or work engagement 49–51. Specific answers are still needed to understand the effects of micro-breaks on well-being and performance, to explore whether they have an optimal duration and how vital the contextual factors are. We can rely on multiple explanatory theories to understand how micro-breaks act on individual outcomes. From a fundamental standpoint, the cognitive load theory states that the mental capacity in working memory is limited, and if a task requires too much ability, learning will be hindered 31–33. Individuals have limited cognitive resources; when allocating resources to one task, their availability becomes limited for other jobs 34.

See the latest data and insights from our annual study of employees worldwide. Other breaks can be unpaid, provided that the employee is completely relieved of work duties. If the employee is not completely relieved of work duties, the break must be paid. Employers are not required to allow breaks under Minnesota law for workers who fall under these exceptions.

Fig 1. The PRISMA flow diagram of the literature search and selection process.

• It’s definitely dependant on the person and the organisation, but taking work breaks is evidently something that needs to be de-stigmatised.
• Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments.
• It is hard to conduct real intervention-control-group designs in such work settings.
• The lunch “hour” may be a concept of the past, new research from staffing firm OfficeTeam suggests.

Whether employees decide to use their 30-minutes eating a freshly cooked meal or to just go for a walk, it’s important to step away from the computer and take a break. Employers can require that their employees stay on the premises during their breaks. As the break is 20 minutes or longer, and assuming the employee is completely relieved of their work duties, the time does not need to be paid.

If I have an employee who wants to work through their breaks, do I need to require them to take breaks?

Thus, one’s evaluation of their subjective experience can be more suitable than other individuals’ reports or assessments. However, future studies could also benefit from a combination of self-reports of well-being with objective measures of the bio-behavioral systems involved (e.g., endocrinological indicators) 130. Another aspect that could moderate the effect of the break on the cognitive resources’ restoration is the type of break taken by the control group (i.e., no break vs. some form of task interruption) that is generally used in experimental studies.

A growing body of literature focused on the recovery after the work-related energies have been exhausted 28–30. However, the process of recovery that happens during the workday or between work tasks is still insufficiently analyzed, and conclusions on their effects are still not clear. The present meta-analysis addresses these limitations, focusing on the recovery process by including experimental studies investigating the momentary impact of micro-breaks between work tasks on well-being and performance. However, such studies found positive effects of breaks on performance which bolster the argument that breaks might even improve perfomance.

The Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA) Employer Handbook

• One one in three Gen Z (29%) and Millennials (35%) employees take a lunch break 5 days a week.
• In the organizational literature, this concept was introduced as a brief resource-replenishing strategy, taken informally between work tasks 19, 20.
• These were relatively homogeneous, and none of the included moderators were significant.
• When considering experimental studies conducted only in real-life work settings, the patterns of results are similar.

In other words, even if we dismiss all the studies finding a positive impact of breaks on task efficiency and consider micro-breaks as not improving performance, taking a break at 56% of employees take a lunch break of 30 minutes or less least does not harm it. Also, the boost in performance may be occupation or task specific (e.g., computer operators 56, or even surgeons 116, 117), an avenue of research that further deserves scholarly focus. Finally, the measurement and conceptualization issues are primarily relevant for the performance outcome because performance can mean different things in different environments 70. For some work positions, performance could mean having a prompt reaction time, for others could mean displaying correct responses, while for others could mean generating a new and divergent set of ideas. Moreover, self-reported performance represents a subjective perception that is susceptible to distortions. Therefore, our final question investigates the effect of such methodological factors.

In his professional career he’s written over 100 research papers, articles and blog posts. Some of his most popular published works include his writing about economic terms and research into job classifications.Jack received his BS from Hampshire College. Kevin Kniffin, a Cornell University assistant professor and author of a study that found that groups that eat together perform better together, further espoused the values of eating together to Business News Daily. She spends three days a week in the office, and two days working from home. Helping those desk lunch devotees, Little Leaf Farms has created a Happy Desk Salad Kit containing everything needed to turn any desk lunch into a five-star dining event.

These extra activities can also be included in restaurant advertising to Online Food Orderers. According to AudienceSCAN, Online Food Orderers participate on Facebook (85.7%), YouTube (68.1%), Instagram (50.2%) and Twitter (46.4%). About 33% enjoy reading fiction books or novels and 20.8% enjoy hiking/​walking long distances for health. All of these activities can be incorporated in ads as things the customer could be doing in the time they saved by ordering food online while on their limited work break.

The break can decrease this risk, interrupt spontaneous ideas that cross to mind rapidly and unconsciously 105 and refocus the attention on the next task, facilitating performance. A systematic overview of the studies’ characteristics (e.g., participants, design) is displayed in Table 1. A summary of attributes of experimental manipulations (e.g., breaks, tasks before breaks) and outcomes are shown in Table 2. The main research questions were addressed using random-effects meta-analyses based on Borenstein et al.’s 73 framework. We used effect size estimates based on the between-groups standardized mean difference (Cohen’s d) 74, with 95% confidence intervals and two-sided p-values. Positive estimates represent effects in the hypothesized direction (i.e., increased vigor and performance; decreased fatigue), while negative values indicate opposed ones.

Supporting information

Employees are no longer satisfied with pizzas or biryani boxes delivered in 30 minutes at their workplace or homes. They wish to be attentive to their diet and they want to eat fast but eat well. With evolving food choices, various organisations are ensuring that healthy, fresh and varied meals are delivered to employees thereby enhancing their meal experience. A break from stress and screens, better quality sleep, increased productivity, improved stress management, reduced feelings of fatigue or even exhaustion are some of the frequent discussions that take place around us. Many international studies have shown that there is a long list of benefits to be gained from a real break in the middle of the day.

View All Energy & Natural Resources

I have no problem with this definition because the authors explain everything well in the manuscript, so there is no ambivalence. On the other hand, researcher with a more cognitive experimental focus often differ in the use of what is a micro break versus a short break versus long breaks. Furthermore, because all the studies considered in the present meta-analysis used self-reports of well-being outcomes, our results could be exposed to response biases 128.

Concerning Workplace Distraction Statistics : Facts + Trends

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here. Because resource expenditure and recovery can be affected by several contextual and personal factors 63, 64, we consider several additional moderators. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. “My office has a kitchen that contains snacks, so I appreciate that I could quickly grab something if I needed to without having to leave the building,” she adds.

Are any workers not covered by the meal and rest break requirements?

Their 2022 survey found that encouraging employees to take lunch could even retain workers – more than 9 in 10 employees say they are more likely to stay at a company where bosses encourage their employees to take breaks. Jennifer Deal, senior research scientist at Center for Effective Organizations at the University of Southern California, said that the brain doesn’t have a chance to reset without breaks and it might be hard to keep doing the same thing all day. However, it’s ultimately up to the worker on how they want to organize their day’s breaks.

The second research question refers to the efficacy of micro-breaks in enhancing participants’ performance. In this respect, we would like to see whether we could find sufficient meta-analytic support for the idea that, despite slightly reducing the time allocated to the task, could micro-breaks actually augment one’s performance? In addition to these central questions, we wanted to refine our finding by exploring the impact of several moderator variables. Cost is one of the major reasons survey participants reported free lunch would be a factor in motivating them to show up to the office.